If the approval of the thesis is pending, or the candidate has not yet been granted permission to defend the thesis, the institution can investigate the allegations by following an internal procedure, unless the researcher suspected of a RCR violation insists on an investigation according to these guidelines. The investigation procedure for alleged violations of the responsible conduct of research involves three steps: Login to enter a peer comment or grade. The investigation procedure for alleged violations of the responsible conduct of research involves three steps:. The notification of alleged RCR misconduct is to be sent to the respective university or university of applied sciences or to the research institute in which the research has primarily been conducted. An investigation proper is, however, warranted if the preliminary inquiry has revealed indications of wider-ranging misconduct than was initially suspected. A reasoned assessment of the investigation committee to determine whether the suspected activity in each specific allegation in the written notification constitutes a violation against or disregard towards the responsible conduct of research.
This decision must mention that a party dissatisfied with the decision can request a statement from The Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity within six months of the decision see Point Research misconduct and disregard for the responsible conduct of research will not expire. Furthermore, an effort must be made to publish the findings of the investigation in an appropriate publication channel if the person alleged of misconduct so desires, or if there are other compelling reasons. This allegation cannot be made anonymously. Post Your ideas for ProZ. The rector will decide on the potential consequences should the allegations regarding the violation of the RCR be unfounded or malicious.
The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.
Share this page Share this page on Twitter Facebook. It is in the mutual interests of society, the research community, and the researchers, to resolve all allegations of research misconduct.
See the guidelines for formulating a request for a statement. The premise of the RCR guidelines is that promoting the responsible conduct of research and handling alleged violations are primarily the responsibility of the organisations conducting research.
Skip to main content.
CV (RCR or PCR) de BI, no soplos, pulsos, ptes
Spanish term or phrase: Post Your ideas for ProZ. If a decision is made to conduct the preliminary inquiry, the instigator of the allegation, the person alleged of misconduct and the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity must be notified immediately of the inquiry and of the grounds for it.
Patents, Trademarks, Copyright Law: Return to KudoZ list. This allegation cannot be made anonymously. A proposal concerning the publishing of the conclusions of the final report as stipulated in Point 9, and possible proposals on how the consequences of the violation should be rectified.
In its statement, The Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity may propose that the rector conduct an additional investigation if there are well-founded reasons for this in the material provided for the preliminary inquiry, in the final report of the investigation proper, or in the information provided by an involved party in its request for a statement. For the investigation proper, the rector will establish an investigation committee and invite the expert members to join, one of whom will be appointed as chair of the committee.
The preliminary inquiry must be conducted within three months of receiving the notification, unless there are specific reasons to grant additional time for the completion of the inquiry. The appointment of the investigation committee and its activities must be in accordance with the Finnish Administrative Law and its stipulations about conflict of interest. Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. Close and don’t show again Close.
In addition, the reported violation against the responsible conduct of research can lead to other sanctions that the rector is justified or obligated to impose on the basis of, for instance, legislation pertaining to administrative, criminal, labour or contract law. If the investigation finds that the misconduct constitutes a violation against the responsible conduct of research, measures must be taken to publish the findings of the final report in a manner deemed appropriate by the committee and when possible, at least in the publication channel where the fraudulent research findings or results based on fraudulent means have already been published.
This decision may also be made public if so requested by the person alleged of misconduct or if the publishing of it is otherwise deemed necessary. This decision must be communicated to the person alleged of misconduct, to the instigator of the allegation as well as to the Advisory Board on Research Integrity.
If after the preliminary inquiry, there is still reason to suspect disregard of the responsible conduct of research or research misconduct, the rector must initiate the investigation proper. The allegation of a violation of the responsible conduct of research must be communicated in writing to the rector or to another decision-maker in a similar position hereafter the rector.
At least two members of the committee must be external to the organisation conducting the investigation. Furthermore, the Advisory Board must issue a statement addressed to the party that has instigated vitze process, and this statement must also be delivered to the rector and to the other parties involved.
View forum View forum without registering on UserVoice. Furthermore, the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity can also recommend an curricupum if it has reason to suspect misconduct within the organisation in question.
The allegation regarding RCR misconduct and the decisions related to this allegation during curricuulum RCR process are to be reported to TENK, so that it can monitor vvitae to the guidelines and the state of research integrity in Finland. The RCR guidelines published by the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity are internal ethical guidelines for the Finnish research community and are used for addressing allegations of the violations of the responsible conduct of research in universities, research institutes, universities of applied sciences, and in other research organisations.
Investigation of misconduct in Finland | TENK
This text appears directly after the text from the? The person alleged of misconduct, the instigator of the allegation and, if necessary, experts and other persons involved.
If the investigation finds that rr person alleged of misconduct has not violated the responsible conduct of research, the person alleged of misconduct and the instigator of the allegation must be notified of this decision. On the basis of the preliminary inquiry, if the allegation turns out to be unfounded, the rector will make a reasoned decision to discontinue the investigation process.
The curriculum defines the process of training and the competences needed for the successful completion of training in Clinical Radiology. If the investigation committee has not completed the investigation within six months of it being established, it must submit a report concerning the delay to the rector, who will then make a decision regarding the additional time required.